United States of America: District Court for the Northern District of California issued its ruling in Epic Games v Apple holding Apple in civil contempt and imposing restrictions on linked-out purchases

Description

District Court for the Northern District of California issued its ruling in Epic Games v Apple holding Apple in civil contempt and imposing restrictions on linked-out purchases

On 30 April 2025, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its ruling in Epic Games v Apple (Epic III), 781 F. Supp. 3d 943 (N.D. Cal. 2025), holding Apple in civil contempt for noncompliance with the Injunction and denying Apple's motion to set aside the Injunction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). The court found that Apple had prohibited App Store developers from using buttons, links, and other calls to action without paying a prohibitive 27% commission on linked-out purchases and had restricted the design of developers' links to make it difficult for customers to use them. The court permanently enjoined Apple from imposing any commission or fee on linked-out purchases, restricting or conditioning developers' style, language, formatting, quantity, flow, or placement of links for purchases outside an app, prohibiting or limiting the use of buttons or other calls to action for purchases outside an app, excluding certain categories of apps and developers from obtaining link access, interfering with consumers' choice to proceed in or out of an app using anything other than a neutral message, and restricting developers' use of dynamic links. The court also referred Apple and one of its officers for criminal investigation.

Original source

Scope

Policy Area
Competition
Policy Instrument
Unilateral conduct regulation
Regulated Economic Activity
software provider: app stores
Implementation Level
subnational
Government Branch
judiciary
Government Body
court

Complete timeline of this policy change

Hide details
2021-09-10
in force

On 10 September 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California reached its v…

2021-10-08
under appeal

On 8 October 2021, one month after the US District Court for the Northern District of California re…

2021-12-08
adopted

On 8 December 2021, the Court of Appeals ruled to allow the delayment of previously ordered changes…

2023-04-24
in force

On 24 April 2023, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its ruling concerning Epic G…

2023-07-17
under investigation

On 17 July 2023, the Court of Appeal postponed the abolition of Apple's anti-steering rules within …

2023-08-09
under investigation

On 9 August 2023, the US Supreme Court upheld the decision to delay the removal of Apple's anti-ste…

2023-09-27
under appeal

On 27 September 2023, Epic Games Inc. (Epic) filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supre…

2023-09-27
under appeal

On 27 September 2023, Apple Inc. (Apple) filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme C…

2025-04-30
in force

On 30 April 2025, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued i…

2025-06-04
in force

On 4 June 2025, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied Apple Inc.’s emergency motion …

2025-12-11
in force

On 11 December 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its ruling in …

2026-05-04
under appeal

On 4 May 2026, Apple filed an application in the Supreme Court of the United States, directed to th…

2026-05-05
under appeal

On 5 May 2026, Epic Games filed its response to Apple's application for a stay of the Ninth Circuit…

2026-05-06
in force

On 6 May 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States denied Apple's application to stay the Ninth …