Australia: Privacy Commissioner issued statement on administrative tribunal's decision on Bunnings's use of facial recognition technology

Description

Privacy Commissioner issued statement on administrative tribunal's decision on Bunnings's use of facial recognition technology

On 5 March 2026, the Privacy Commissioner issued a statement on the administrative review tribunal’s decision on Bunnings’ use of facial recognition technology (FRT) under the Privacy Act. The Tribunal found that Bunnings’ use of FRT to address significant retail crime and protect staff and customers could be justified due to the scale of violence and theft in its stores and the security safeguards in place. However, it upheld earlier findings that Bunnings failed to properly notify customers and lacked adequate policies governing the technology. The Commissioner stated that the decision confirms that biometric data collected through facial recognition remains subject to Privacy Act safeguards, even when processed briefly. The Commissioner also noted that the ruling sets a high threshold for the deployment of facial recognition technology and that organisations must conduct detailed risk assessments before using such systems.

Original source

Scope

Policy Area
Data governance
Policy Instrument
Data protection regulation
Regulated Economic Activity
other service provider
Implementation Level
national
Government Branch
executive
Government Body
data protection authority

Complete timeline of this policy change

Hide details
2024-11-19
in force

On 19 November 2024, the Australian Privacy Commissioner ruled that Bunnings Groups Ltd had breache…

2026-02-04
in force

On 4 February 2026, the Administrative Review Tribunal issued a decision concerning Bunnings Group …

2026-03-05
under deliberation

On 5 March 2026, the Privacy Commissioner issued a statement on the administrative review tribunal’…