Description

Legal Board of Appeal dismisses appeal on patent applications designating AI as inventor

On 21 December 2021, the European Patent Office's (EPO) Legal Board of Appeal confirmed that, under the European Patent Convention (EPC), an inventor named in a patent application must be a human individual and not a machine. The ruling was made in response to an appeal from the EPO's Receiving Section, which had previously denied two applications in which the artificial intelligence system known DABUS was named as patent inventor. According to the Receiving Section only a human inventor qualifies as inventor under the EPC, and a machine could not transfer any rights to the patent application. The Legal Board of Appeal agreed with these points, emphasising that an inventor must have legal competence under the EPC.

Original source

Scope

Policy Area
Content moderation
Policy Instrument
Patent protection regulation
Regulated Economic Activity
cross-cutting
Implementation Level
supranational
Government Branch
executive
Government Body
other regulatory body

Complete timeline of this policy change

Hide details
2019-12-20
under investigation

On 20 December 2019, the European Patent Office (EPO) rejected two European patent applications (EP…

2020-12-27
under deliberation

On 27 December 2020, the European Patent Office (EPO) issued its conclusion explaining why it refus…

2021-12-21
in force

On 21 December 2021, the European Patent Office's (EPO) Legal Board of Appeal confirmed that, under…