United States of America: Filed Lawsuit concerning constitutionality and legal validity of California Assembly Bill No. 587 (X Corp v. Bonta)

Description

Filed Lawsuit concerning constitutionality and legal validity of California Assembly Bill No. 587 (X Corp v. Bonta)

On 8 September 2023, X Corp. has filed a legal challenge against California Assembly Bill No. 587 (AB 587), which mandates large social media companies to publicly post terms of service regarding content moderation and submit detailed reports on their content moderation practices to the California Attorney General. X Corp. argues that California Assembly Bill No. 587 (AB 587) violates the First Amendment by compelling the company to speak and interfering with its editorial decisions. The company also claims that the law infringes on California's Constitution, imposes an undue burden on interstate commerce, and conflicts with Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Additionally, X Corp. contends that AB 587 gives the California Attorney General excessive enforcement powers.

Original source

Scope

Policy Area
Content moderation
Policy Instrument
Content moderation regulation
Regulated Economic Activity
platform intermediary: user-generated content
Implementation Level
national
Government Branch
judiciary
Government Body
court

Complete timeline of this policy change

Hide details
2023-09-08
under deliberation

On 8 September 2023, X Corp. has filed a legal challenge against California Assembly Bill No. 587 (…

2023-12-28
in force

On 28 December 2023, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California denied…

2024-07-17
under appeal

On 17 July 2024, an appeal was filed challenging the district court's decision to deny a preliminar…

2024-09-04
in force

On 4 September 2024, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court's denial of X C…