United States of America: Issued Supreme Court Ruling in Lawsuit regarding worker qualification in Proposition 22 (Castellanos v California)

Description

Issued Supreme Court Ruling in Lawsuit regarding worker qualification in Proposition 22 (Castellanos v California)

On 25 July 2024, the Supreme Court of California issued a ruling upholding the constitutionality of Proposition 22, a state ballot measure that classifies drivers for rideshare companies as independent contractors rather than employees. Proposition 22 was approved in 2020 and defines app-based transportation and delivery drivers as independent contractors and also adopts certain labour and wage policies that apply only to app-based drivers and to companies such as Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash. The ruling confirms that rideshare drivers are not covered by California’s worker compensation laws but are entitled to benefits under Proposition 22, including 120% of the state minimum wage, healthcare stipends, occupational insurance, death insurance, and an additional 30 cents per mile for active driving hours, excluding waiting times, provided the drivers are working over 15 hours a week.

Original source

Scope

Policy Area
Labour law
Policy Instrument
Worker classification or protection regulation
Regulated Economic Activity
platform intermediary: other
Implementation Level
subnational
Government Branch
judiciary
Government Body
court

Complete timeline of this policy change

Hide details
2021-08-20
under investigation

On 20 August 2021, the Alameda County Superior Court in California issued a ruling concerning the l…

2023-03-13
in force

On 13 March 2023, the First Appellate District of the Court of Appeal of the State of California is…

2024-07-25
in force

On 25 July 2024, the Supreme Court of California issued a ruling upholding the constitutionality of…