United Kingdom: Issued interim judgment allowing for the continuation of lawsuit alleging unilateral conduct in the App Store (Dr Sean Ennis v Apple Inc)

Compare with different regulatory event:

Description

Issued interim judgment allowing for the continuation of lawsuit alleging unilateral conduct in the App Store (Dr Sean Ennis v Apple Inc)

On 12 April 2024, the Competition Appeal Tribunal issued a judgment against Apple Inc., concerning its applications for strike-out/summary judgment, jurisdiction, and service out in a case involving commission charges on transactions via its app stores. The Tribunal unanimously decided that the Proposed Class Representative (PCR) has a realistic prospect of establishing that the UK law governs the claim and that Apple's conduct falls within the territorial scope of section 18 of the Competition Act 1998 and/or Article 102 of the Treaty for the Functioning of the European Union. It was determined that the Tribunal is the appropriate forum for the trial of the PCR's claims regarding commissions charged on transactions via non-UK storefronts. Furthermore, the Tribunal found no breach of duty in the PCR's application for permission to serve out of the jurisdiction, dismissing Apple's applications accordingly.

Original source

Scope

Policy Area
Competition
Policy Instrument
Unilateral conduct regulation
Regulated Economic Activity
software provider: app stores
Implementation Level
national
Government Branch
judiciary
Government Body
court

Complete timeline of this policy change

Hide details
2024-04-12
under investigation

On 12 April 2024, the Competition Appeal Tribunal issued a judgment against Apple Inc., concerning …